In 2024, NATO made clear that the battlefronts of global security had shifted. Faded are the boundaries of tangible borderlines, for today’s warscape extends from cyberspace to low Earth orbit, and increasingly the synthetically-conceived reasonings of artificial intelligence. Asserted in Vilnius at the outset and reasserted afresh in Brussels this year, NATO placed its mark upon a new reality of strategy: the fate of war no longer resides solely with missiles and boots, but now with sensors and satellites, and machine learning too, alongside sovereign data’s persistence. From Ukraine’s eastern trenches, where asymmetric warfare is being rewritten by AI-powered surveillance and drone warfare, to the Red Sea, where real-time-responding autonomous naval platforms patrolling the ocean keep threats in check, use of technology has taken center stage in war.
“A nation’s ability to fight a modern war is as good as its technological ability.”
–Frank Whittle–
Canada is coming back to its role as a policy and technological leader. Its 2024 Indo-Pacific Strategy, NORAD modernization commitments, and the expanded mandate of the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security signal a new national security approach. Programs such as Innovation for Defence Excellence and Security (IDEaS), and Canadian leadership in NATO’s Defence Innovation Accelerator for the North Atlantic (DIANA), are putting the country at the forefront of allied innovation. Policy frameworks are evolving to keep up with change. Canada is demanding agile procurement, interoperable standards among NATO partners, and moral guardrails for dual-use technologies like AI and quantum computing. The stakes are clear: whoever integrates new technologies first—and responsibly—will set the geopolitics for decades.
Policy frameworks are evolving to keep up with change. Canada is demanding agile procurement, interoperable standards among NATO partners, and moral guardrails for dual-use technologies like AI and quantum computing. The stakes are clear: whoever integrates new technologies first—and responsibly—will set the geopolitics for decades.
The Russia-Ukraine war remains the world’s most technologically advanced active conflict. NATO-supplied drones, satellite imagery from vendors like Maxar Technologies, and combat artificial intelligence platforms developed by Palantir have all reshaped logistics, intelligence, and targeting. Ukraine’s use of low-cost FPV drones to deliver precision firepower and Russia’s sophisticated jamming capability presage the democratization of battlefield innovation. The Israel-Palestine conflict intensified dramatically in October 2023, with Hamas’ coordinated surprise attacks prompting a large-scale Israeli military response in Gaza. Israel’s Iron Dome system today uses artificial intelligence to filter out incoming missiles, and both sides employ commercially available drone tech and end-to-end encryption. The information battlefield—permeated with deepfakes and AI-assisted propaganda—has become nearly as intense as the physical battlefield. Newsguard analysis found that during the first week of the Israel-Hamas conflict, 73% of the 250 most-engaged false or unsubstantiated claims on X (formerly Twitter) originated and spread via paid verified accounts. Elsewhere, tensions simmer and technology plays a central role. In the Sahel, armies of governments and insurgent forces employ off-the-shelf drones and social media manipulation to gain tactical advantage. In the South China Sea, China’s AI-driven surveillance and naval operations have led to increased tensions with U.S. and allied military forces. Cyberattacks on infrastructure in Europe and North America continue to increase, with ransomware and data breaches widely attributed to Iranian, North Korean, or Russian-sponsored actors. The modern battlefield is increasingly a testbed for advanced technologies that were once the domain of science fiction. Palantir Technologies, through its Gotham and Foundry platforms, has revolutionized military intelligence. In Ukraine and NATO training exercises, the platforms integrate satellite imagery, live drone video, and sensor data to create a real-time, all-source operational picture. Gotham provides commanders with AI-driven predictive models to simulate likely enemy actions, allowing for faster, more informed decision-making. Foundry’s data architecture manages huge repositories of structured and unstructured data, optimizing everything from supply chains to employee deployment. The value proposition is not in raw data collection, but in smart synthesis in real-time. Anduril Industries brings autonomy to the battlefield with the Ghost drone and its Lattice AI platform. The technologies allow networked, adaptive responses to threats, using swarm technology and machine learning to locate and destroy targets with minimal human involvement. Their application in border patrol and forward base security is transforming perimeter security, particularly in contested or remote NATO areas. Hypersonic missile development—particularly the U.S. Army’s Dark Eagle program—is advancing despite setbacks. These missiles, flying at speeds over Mach 5, reduce response time and also make existing missile defence systems more challenging. While China and Russia have already deployed operational hypersonics, NATO is endeavouring to integrate them into a synchronized early-warning and multi-domain command system to ensure strategic parity. AI-powered combat systems are emerging from laboratories into warzones. The U.S. Army’s deployment of robotic quadrupeds, or “robot dogs,” equipped with weapons and sensors for Middle Eastern urban testing, marks a shift toward autonomous engagement. China has mirrored these efforts in Southeast Asia, demonstrating AI coordination in joint military exercises. These systems raise critical questions about human oversight and rules of engagement but are undeniably changing tactical doctrines. Cognitive electronic warfare—another frontier—is being pursued most aggressively by China. These AI-driven systems scan and disrupt electromagnetic spectrums in real-time, jamming or hijacking enemy communications, GPS signals, and missile guidance systems. Unlike conventional jammers, cognitive EW platforms learn and adapt in real time, targeting systems dynamically and increasing the cost of countermeasures. Quantum computing also looms as a strategic differentiator. While still nascent, NATO allies are investing heavily in quantum encryption for secure communications and in quantum sensors capable of detecting stealth objects or subterranean movement. If matured, these technologies could nullify traditional stealth and shift the balance in intelligence gathering.
Canada is aligning its innovation system with NATO’s strategic needs. NORAD modernization includes new radar, next-generation satellite communications, and artificial intelligence-based early warning systems critical to Arctic and North American defense. The IDEaS program has issued over 400 contracts to Canadian companies since 2020 for autonomous vehicles, cybersecurity, and soldier performance technology. The Canadian Centre for Cyber Security is increasingly integrated with NATO’s Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence, sharing intelligence on ransomware, zero-day vulnerabilities, and nation-state cyber threats. Canada’s Defence Policy Update also proposed reforms to defence procurement aimed at closing the gap between startup agility and bureaucratic rigidity, also will increase our defence spending by $8.1 billion over the next five years, starting in 2024-25, and $73 billion over the next twenty years.
As artificial intelligence weapons, autonomous vehicles, and live feed surveillance tools become the centre stage of defence, issues related to accountability, transparency, and international law are fast becoming pressing matters. Professor and Nobel laureate Hinton was one of the first AI experts to endorse the call for new international law to prohibit and regulate autonomous weapons systems. In October 2013, Hinton endorsed an open letter from more than 270 engineers, computer scientists and AI experts that called for a ban on weapon systems that make the decision to apply violent force autonomously, without any human control. In July 2015, Hinton signed a call from nearly 35,000 AI and tech experts that called a military AI arms race “a bad idea” and urged a preventative ban on autonomous weapons that operate beyond meaningful human control. In November 2017, Hinton joined other AI experts in urging Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to take a stand against autonomous weapons, arguing that their development and use crossed a “clear moral line.” Canada has been a vocal advocate for embedding ethical standards into defence AI through the Defence Ethical AI Strategy, emphasizing fairness, transparency, reliability, and accountability. The Tallinn Manual on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Warfare offers a foundation for conduct in digital conflict, but global norms lag behind technological progress. Without enforceable international standards, there’s a risk that AI could escalate conflict or be misused in asymmetric warfare. Ethics must not be an afterthought. The responsible development of military technology demands rigorous oversight, interdisciplinary dialogue, and public accountability. As NATO deepens its technological edge, it must also strengthen its moral one. Security today is not being quantified in guns only—but in foresight, vision, and how rapidly coalitions can convert ideas into action. The defence of the future will be shaped by quantum leaps, self-aware machines, cognitive warfare, and battle plans based on AI. But also by whether the democratic world can harness these technologies with ethical accuracy, strategic foresight, and collaboration across frontiers. Canada’s contributions—spanning from monitoring in the Arctic to cyber resilience—highlight the fact that middle powers are able to lead both by innovation and principle. While NATO is confronted with a crisis-ridden world, it must double down on its finest asset: the solidarity of the allies that are united for peace, progress, and prudent power.
NATO is built on security, but it’s also built on values.
NATO YOUTH 🇨🇦 
Leave a comment